top of page

⏱️The Hidden Cost of TRI Reporting: Where Projects Lose Time and Money💰

  • 5 days ago
  • 2 min read

The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Program requires an extensive annual report. Established under the Emergency Planning and Community Right‑to‑Know Act (EPCRA), it requires certain facilities to track, calculate, and report their releases and waste management activities for hundreds of listed chemicals. Here are the most common places where facilities lose time and money while preparing their TRI report.


Costs of Preparing the Report

If your facility submits 3-5 form R’s, this accounts for up to 100 hours of EHS staff’s time. This limits the time that in-house teams can spend on other tasks, potentially leading to risk of non-compliance in other programs and employee burnout.

Alternatively, hiring consultants is often more expensive than in-house preparation. In addition to expensive hourly rates, the in-house EHS team will still need to gather information and fact-check the spreadsheets generated by consultants. 


Personnel Change and Staffing Issues

In the event of staffing changes, or shifting roles and responsibilities, TRI reporting consistency can be a challenge. The report requires extensive regulatory and process knowledge, as well as an understanding of what has been reported, historically. More junior staff may not be qualified to complete the report, while senior staff experience competing priorities. 

Changes in staffing or responsibilities cost your facility time and money, as the individual preparing the report scrambles to understand the complexities of how your processes contribute to TRI. Legacy spreadsheets that may have been understandable to previous employees will take time for new employees to wrangle leading to frustration and rework.


Legacy Data

Facilities relying on legacy data will find that disconnected spreadsheets with unclear formulas and assumptions cost staff and the facility time and money. It is uncommon for a TRI program to have clean and clear documentation and calculations from year to year. This disorganization, especially if the program changes hands between reporting years, slows down the process. 


Regulatory Changes

TRI’s chemical list is updated every year.  How does your facility track these changes, ensure each year’s report is up to date, and avoid mistakes from last year’s data? Monitoring and implementing these frequent changes costs programs time and money.


Alignment with Other Reports

Your TRI report will be compared to the conditions of your air permit or your reported air emission inventory at the end of the year. If your report is inaccurate, this could create problems downstream during the reconciliation process.


Solutions

To save time and money, consider a trusted compliance software such as TRI Toolkit. Your in-house hours will be reduced, you will be protected from staffing changes and legacy data, and you can be confident the report aligns with the most recent regulatory requirements as well as items such as your air permit. 


Want to learn more?


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page